Are the Welsh the lost ten tribes of Israel?
by cymrusofren
(This article was originally published on the Daily Wales news site where all the archived articles including this one can be found here)
For over 35 years, historians Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett have been making the case for the real history of the Britons to be taught and studied, fighting against what they describe as a London establishment obsessed with stopping the true history of Britain from being divulged.
For those increasingly sceptical about how a version of the history of Wales, Britain, and much of the world has been pushed by London-centric establishment bodies and academia, it’s an area ripe for scrutiny.
Alan Wilson
Mr Wilson states that the known recorded history of Britain starts in and around 1500 -1350 BC, possibly earlier, with large scale migration into Europe and Britain from ancient Mesopotamia (corresponding to modern-day Iraq and Kuwait, north eastern Syria and parts of Turkey and Iran) and a later mass migration from around 500BC of those descended from both the lost tribes of Israel and those descended from the besieged city of Troy in what is now western Turkey. These are believed to have travelled to Britain via northern Italy and the European continent. To add to this, Welsh history such as that found in the chronicle of the early Britons ‘Brut y Bryttaniait’ (often referred to as ‘Tysilio Chronicles’) clearly states that Brutus of Troy and his vast army landed in Britain from around 1170 BC and became the first known King of the Britons, starting what is the true Royal Brythonic dynasty of Britain.
Wilson and Blackett are also renowned for their huge body of research on Brenin Arthur /King Arthur and state that two Arthurs existed: King Arthur I who died in 400 AD and King Arthur II who died in 579AD.
The Ten Tribes of Israel (which later included two other assimilated tribes from Judea) were known to the Assyrian Emperors as the Khumry – a name too close to our modern day Cymry/Cymru to be a fleeting coincidence.
It’s also claimed that the Khumry tribes brought Arch y Cyfamod – the Ark of the Covenant – with them after King Jehoash removed it from Jerusalem circa 790 BC and that the Ark has been in Wales since 500 BC. Y Greal Sanctaidd/ Holy Grail is said to include the Ten Commandments inscribed on the two stone tablets placed in the Ark by Moses.
The original lost Ten Tribes, up to two million strong, never got lost; they cultivated the European continent giving birth to European civilisation, using Prydain/Britain as their base and going on to inhabit North America, Canada, Argentina, Australia and New Zealand in large numbers in recent centuries.
Vernacularly known in modern history texts as Celts, the language connecting all these people is described as being the language of the Khumric tribes – the indigenous British language of Cymraeg/Welsh.
Being the the original language of all of Britain, the Welsh language of the Khumry is part of a heritage that belongs to all modern day UK state citizens, be they from Wales, England, Cornwall or Scotland or Northern Ireland.
The Republic of Ireland and the crown dependencies of the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey also have an obvious interest in this shared heritage as do most Europeans and a massive amount of modern day North Americans, Canadians, Australians, Argentinians and New Zealanders.
A version of the Coelbren alphabet according to Llawdden 1400 -1480
Alan Wilson, together with Baram Blackett, state that the timeless Khumric Coelbren alphabet can be found and read on inscripted Coelbren stones scattered all along the ancient ancestral migration trails between Egypt, the Middle East, Europe and the USA.
The sarcophagus of Eshmunazar II with what is believed to be a Phoenician Coelbren alphabet. Photo: Eric Chan
Wilson and Blackett’s work points out that the Coelbren stones follow the recorded path of the Khumric people that were led out of Egypt by Moses circa 1628 BC after the country was besieged by environmental and political disaster.
Most of the Khumry eventually reached Palestine during the age of the Hittite empire and were then eventually uprooted north to Armenia by the warmongering despotic Assyrians circa 740-702 BC.
Although hardly wilting flowers when it came to military confrontations – perhaps they were following prophecies or divination – the Khumry then eventually move west to the Dardanelles sea route in modern day north west Turkey by around 650 BC.
From around 500 BC onwards, half the Khumry migrated to Italy (northern Italy especially) as well as Switzerland, Austria and the rest of the European continent.
This would certainly go a long way in explaining the often mentioned similarities between the Welsh and Italians, in language, passion and music.
The other half sailed to the nearby Island of Lemnos and, along with a number of the Khumric speaking Trojans, then set sail for Britain where they joined the existing Khumric tribes.
A major Coelbren inscribed stone was found on the island of Lemnos in 1876 which describes the fleets gathering there to sail the Khumry people to the great green island out in the western Ocean of the Atlantic – Britain.
The Lemnos Stele. Photo: Dan Difffendale
The Lemnos Stele side view. Photo: Dan Difffendale
The Greeks called the Khumry the “Cimmeroi” and according to Mr Wilson, the Coelbren Alphabet is the alphabet described by Julius Caesar around 55 BC, also adding that Ammianus Marcellinus stated that the Greeks got their alphabet from the Khumric Welsh.
The term Cimmerians/Cimmeroi, Gimir and Gimmiri are thought to be interchangeable names for the Khumry, as the terms Galli/ Gauls /Keltoi and Celt later became names for them across Europe depending on who was doing the describing.
The Etruscan Pyrgi tablets
Wilson states that there are said to be some 14,000 Etruscan inscriptions in Italy and a handful in ancient Rhaetia (Switzerland).
Wilson goes on to describe how a 30 foot long shroud was found wrapped around a mummy in Egypt and how this shroud is plastered with the Coelbren alphabet.
He also states that the two ‘unreadable’ Copper Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran are Coelbren and inscribed in the Welsh (Khumric) language, adding that all pre 330 BC Hieroglyphic inscriptions in Egypt can be read using Khumric Welsh dating back to 2150 BC.
Astonishingly, no one had attempted to read the ‘indecipherable’ Etruscan, Rhaetian, Aegean, and Asia Minor Pelasgian inscriptions using the ancient Khumric Welsh language before Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett did so in 1984.
It is not yet known precisely where the Khumry came from prior to being in Egypt in 2150 BC – probably mostly from Canaan and the northern middle east – but perhaps also from the European continent and Britain itself.
Many may simply have moved to Egypt to trade or to share the unique knowledge, skills and wisdom that the Druids, especially, were known to have possessed – with some suggesting that it was Druidic knowledge that helped build the Egyptian pyramids themselves.
The Druids seemed to have been a particular threat to the later Roman empire as they had astonishing knowledge of astronomy, mathematics, history, medicine, oratory, morality and religion, much of which is said to be found in the infamous Beibl y Coelbren/ Kolbrin bible.
This was the secular Khumric/Celtic equivalent of a bible which Edward I may have tried to destroy by burning Glastonbury Abbey in 1184 AD.
The Druids also later became followers and believers of Christ and his teachings and in the one God/creator, but were not necessarily Christian in the biblical-doctrine religious sense.
Geoffrey of Monmouth, in his historical account ‘The History of the Kings of Britain‘ states that, although there were already Khymric kinsmen in Britain, (with preceding legends such as Hu Gadarn), Brutus of Troy could have been the first known King of Britain from around the late 11th or early 12th century BC.
He may have founded and built Caer Troia/Troia Newydd (New Troy) in what was later called Llundain/London – a thousand and more years before the Romans are claimed to have built it.
In the highly respected ‘A History of Wales’, John Davies also alludes to Brutus of Troy coming to Britain in around 1170 BC – also adding that the Welsh could well have been in Britain much earlier as well.
In his jam packed historical book ‘The Welsh, the biography’ another Welsh historian, Terry Breverton, states:
“A Celtic common language was used across Europe from 4000 BCE (Before current era), based upon the need for communication owing to increased trade. Celtic people were established from Turkey in the East to Spain, Portugal, Britain, and Ireland in the West”
Breverton believes that the Khumric Britons have been in Britain since at least the period after the last Ice Age – around eleven thousand years ago – and probably in the period before the Ice Age as well.
The many Welsh place names found on so many old sites such as Bryn Celli Ddu in Anglesey from 4000 BC seems to attest to this hypothesis.
Genetics may not always be a fashionable or politically correct subject but it is often a very handy reference point.
R1b1b2 haplotype by country
Breverton reminds his readers that the genetic haplogroup R1b is the most frequent occurring Y chromosome in Western Europe (Wales, the Basque country, Ireland, Cornwall, Scotland, France, Galicia, Portugal, Spain, western and northern England, Catalonia and Italy especially) and especially the R1b1a2 (R-M269) branch for which he believes the point of origin to be western Asia/northern Middle East.
Distribution of Haplogroup_R1b_(Y-DNA)
This would certainly tie in with the East-West hypothesis of the Lost Tribes of Israel.
Breverton also states that genetic studies have shown that Tutankhamen of Egypt, his father and grandfather also belonged to the haplogroup R1b1a2 (R-M269) branch that more than 50% of all men in Europe and 70% of British men belong to.
Wilson and Blackett observe however that ‘Celts’ and ‘Celtic’ are terms that came out of Oxford and London in 1814 as a ruse to obscure all original British histories so that the idea of a Hanoverian German monarchy and English Anglo-Saxon empire could be conjured up and marketed to the world. They state that, technically, ‘Khumry’, ‘Khumric Welsh’ or Khumric Britons are historically more accurate descriptions.
So could it be that these Khumric Welsh tribes were, in various numbers, to be found in Britain and Europe as well as Palestine/Canaan and Egypt, with numbers of them simply moving around at various times by land and sea to trade, share knowledge and avoid various environmental and political calamities?
Was this a mostly Khymric speaking commonwealth of nations – an early European and Phoenician/Middle Eastern Union where free trade and the exchange of ideas flourished?
Right now there seem to be as many questions as answers.
And what of the American claim by the Welsh?
Coelbren stones and other credible testimony and evidence have also been found in North America, giving strength to the hypothesis that the ancient Welsh were in America long before Columbus.
The popular belief is that Madog ab Owain Gwynedd sailed to North America in 1170 AD. Wilson and Blackett, using DNA profiling and radiocarbon dating on artifacts and human remains found in the US Midwest and Wales, claim that it was a Madog Morfran ap Meurig that first sailed to the continent, even earlier, circa 562-575 AD.
This was the period soon after or during a massive comet that allegedly destroyed much of Britain, starting the period known as the Dark Ages.
Wilson states that an Admiral Gwenon was then sent out to check on Madog’s discoveries before Brenin Arthur ap Meurig (King Arthur II) led the third major fleet migration in 574.
Although it isn’t an idea put forward by Wilson and Blackett, perhaps it isn’t inconceivable that, as with the two claimed Arthurs, there may well have been two Madogs who sailed to North America at different times as well.
King Arthur’s fleet to North America has been suggested to be in the hundreds in ships and in the tens of thousands in men.
According to Wilson, Welsh shipbuilders were the best in the business and many ancient Khumric kings fought wars of movement that relied upon their being able to move large numbers of troops and vast quantities of supplies from place to place – a fact he says is often overlooked by many establishment figures who are quite happy for other tribal groups, the Angles, the Saxons, the Vikings and others to have sailed long distances in ships of great speed and manoeuvrability.
Madog and King Arthur’s vast armies are believed to have travelled up the intricate river systems of North America, raising structures and encountering friendly and unfriendly tribes of native Americans before finally settling down mostly around the Midwest or the the Great Plains.
There are some claims that they possibly worked with and influenced South American civilisations as well – not so much of a stretch of the imagination if considering the possible influence of the Druids on Egyptian civilisation and Pyramid building.
People would do well to avoid negative knee jerk reactions and keep an open mind in this area – history teaches us that truth is most often far stranger than fiction.
Wilson and Blackett have spent much time in the USA with American historians, collecting considerable evidence and visiting sites of interest.
Evidence of Welsh speaking native Americans is numerous and far more common than what we have perhaps been led to believe, with books and historical records suggesting that this hypothesis cannot now be disregarded.
King Arthur II, claims Wilson, was killed in a battle with Native American tribes in what is today known as Kentucky and his body sent home to Britain.
In 1824, Thomas S Hinde, of the prominent Hinde family, wrote to John S. Williams, editor of The American Pioneer, regarding the Madog tradition. In the letter (pages 373-376) Hinde claimed to have gathered testimony from numerous sources that stated that in 1799, six soldiers had been dug up near Jeffersonville, Indiana, on the Ohio river with breastplates that contained Welsh coat-of-arms. He also gives several references to Welsh and Welsh-speaking Indians. The present-day location of the breast plates are unknown.
Reuben T. Durrett’s book ‘Traditions of the Earliest Visits of Foreigners to North America’ published in 1908 has an incredible amount of references to the Welsh Indians.
As does ‘The Rev Morgan Jones and the Welsh Indians of Virginia‘ published in 1898, and ‘The biography of Francis Lewis and Rev Morgan Jones’ written by Lewis’ granddaughter Julia Delafield and published in 1877.
Y Brenin Arthur
Numerous other credible sources can be found from across much of North America in support of the Welsh American heritage.
Although no comprehensive and thorough pan-Atlantic genetic research seems to have yet been done in this area, it is also interesting to note that many native American tribes in the Midwest and North East of the USA,and Canada especially, have a disproportionately high percentage of the R1b haplogroup (Y-DNA).
As mentioned, the R1b haplogroup Y-DNA (R-M269) is most commonly found in Western Britain and Western Europe, with the highest concentration to be found specifically in Wales at 92.3% as a percentage of total population.
John Evans of Waunfawr is an oft-cited example of an explorer who could not find Welsh speakers in the Mandan tribe. But the Mandan was only one tribe and Evans only explored a small area, mainly following the upper Missouri river.
He did not set out to find all the areas with well documented claims of Welsh speaking locals – in Virginia, north Carolina, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana and Florida to name but a few.
Furthermore, Evans was in the pay of the Spanish crown. If he would have reported evidence of Welsh speaking Indians it would give the Khumric Welsh (and British state at that time and as Welsh descendants Elizabeth the 1st and John Dee had previously claimed) a rightful claim on North America, making Christopher Columbus and the Spanish government’s claim utterly valueless, leaving Evans out of a job and probably in danger of his life.
Maybe he simply didn’t find any evidence on his particular travels and dared not try again in case he found what he may have suspected was true.
One thing is fairly sure – the Christopher Columbus discovery of America is now a defunct historical celebration due to numerous other earlier claims, not least the Madog claim – a claim that is now getting harder to ignore considering the various evidence and numerous Madog/Madoc place names scattered across North America.
Although there can be little doubt that they later became more problematic, the destructive comet and resulting Dark Ages angle suggests that the swift, genocidal Anglo-Saxon conquest of large areas of Britain theory perhaps needs to be re-evaluated as well.
Wilson states that most of Britain was devastated when debris from this comet caused a scatter of vast explosions and devastations equivalent to a rain of perhaps a hundred atomic bombs.
The illiterate German peasants, guided by the Roman church eager for them to colonise were thus able to move into depopulated areas, slowly recovering empty lands in east Britain especially, he claims.
Wilson and Blackett claim that Coelbren alphabet inscriptions also exist on many ancient stones in Britain, notably the stone of King Gorddwfyn. Dafydd ap Gwilym (died 1367 AD) mentions it, as do six other well known bards between AD 1420 to 1480.
The theory that Iolo Morgannwg (born 1747) randomly came up with the Coelbren in some opium den in Hampstead, unless he had a Dr Who Tardis time machine, therefore makes little sense and was presumably an early propaganda piece by an establishment desperate to try and manipulate the true history of Wales and Britain.
Although no historian can be right all of the time, Wilson and Blackett are unequivocal that their body of research is a provable, authentic and accurate ancient national British history.
Thousands of members of the public in Wales, England, Scotland and across the globe are fully aware of the conspiracy to cover up the truth, perpetuated by the BBC and others in academia and beyond.
Real Welsh British history can now thankfully be found being increasingly discussed, researched and debated online.
Contrary to what many (mostly elite English establishment historians) have tried to tell us, the Britons were a highly advanced, culturally developed, literate, metal-working civilization who had followed Christ and his teachings since 35-37 AD – not the illiterate barbarians that the establishment academics would have us believe.
Any notion of a shared or inclusive Brythonic heritage were forgotten however when the London establishment and Crown imported the German Hanoverian family of the elector of Hanover as their puppet Kings and Queens claims Wilson:
“From this point onwards everything historical had to be politically and religiously redesigned into a suitably acceptable form to promote the new Germanism in England in particular, and Britain as a whole.
“From this time onwards the centuries of assaults upon all ancient British history, heritage and culture, accelerated and increased. Everything British had to go.
“The numerous, strong, culturally advanced British nations had to be transformed into primitive tribes of uneducated barely civilized peasant barbarians and the German origins of the Anglo Saxons needed to be promoted and extolled.
“Periodic control of parts of Britain by the Romans were expanded to an imaginary period of 400 years of total domination and described as ‘Roman Britain’ with all the British dynasties suddenly eliminated.”
Wilson and Blackett are certain that, despite the sudden devastating effects of the crashed comet, there were no dark ages in Britain in the political way we have been led to believe. The major Khumric British Kings continued from at least 500 BC to1300 AD and the Khumric British line of kings persisted right through the greatly exaggerated alleged ‘Roman period’.
Commenting on the Dark ages narrative, Wilson writes:
“The near 80 successive Khumric Kings, who ruled from circa 500 BC to AD 1300, included King Arthur I (the first Arthur) son of Mascen Wledig of circa AD 345 -400, who did defeat the Romans as Soissons – Sassy and kill the Roman Emperor Gratian as Lyons-Lugdumum in 383 AD. The sixth generations later King Arthur II (the second Arthur) son of King Meurig, who was born in AD 503, died in 579
“What the Academics in London, Oxford, Cambridge, and elsewhere cannot get into their heads is the provable fact that the British line of Kings persisted right through the greatly exaggerated alleged ‘Roman period’ and that there never was any Roman Britain of the order they imagine, and imagine is the correct word.”
Wilson adds:
“Because it was not possible to murder the entire ancient British nation, the strategy has been to destroy, to eradicate, and to obliterate the vast and entire corpus of all ancient British history. At this present time this deliberate and evil campaign has been largely successful, and the demolition of the truth is gathering pace.
“These organizations have succeeded in transforming the correct image of our ancient British ancestors from being a very well recorded highly civilized, literate, advanced and developed culture that was comparable to anything that Greece, Rome, or Judea, had to offer, into a gross caricature of misrepresentation as a disparate spread of loose primitive near savage tribal peoples.
“The misrepresentation of our ancient British Ancestors is so grotesque as to be almost beyond imagination”
For over 30 years Wilson and Blackett say that they have made every effort and attempt to make the Welsh authorities aware they are sitting on a tourist industry that could offer thousands of jobs where work is much needed, but to no avail.
It is obvious they say, that the real history of Britain and the Britons is of huge potential embarrassment to the London regime, to the Church of England and to the Vatican in Rome.
The media, press and official establishment have tried to destroy them and their characters because they have “dared to question the phoney, fabricated, and forged and quite hilariously stupid set of yarns that have been invented since AD 1714 to masquerade as ancient British history, foisted by the London establishment as servants to the Crown corporation”
But where does all this talk of the lost tribes of Israel leave the people that currently call themselves Jewish? A report published in the Times of Israel in March 2014 declared that modern day Jews are in fact mostly Khazars who converted to the religion of Judaism in the period between the seventh and ninth century and ruled over Khazaria – a vast part of what became southern Russia and Ukraine, before moving in their droves to what we know today as modern Israel and becoming the ancestors of what are often now known as the Ashkenazi Jews.
The report by Israeli researcher Eran Elhaik states that Khazar ancestry is the single largest element in the Ashkenazi Jewish gene pool.
A team of esteemed scholars from leading research institutions and museums also issued a report to the Israeli government acknowledging that European Jews are in fact Khazars – research which the Israeli government have accepted prompting many Israelis to suggest creating a new second homeland in the present day Ukraine which would have been part of the original Khazaria empire.
According to Alan Wilson, this figure of present day Ashkenazi Jews in Israel not being ethnically or originally Jewish/Israelite is put at around 95% of the population, while up to 5% of the present day population are thought to be remnants of the original ethnic Israelites.
This would certainly make sense if we consider that most of the original tribes of Israel would have left this area of the middle east many centuries before if following the Lost Ten Tribes hypothesis.
The ‘anti Semitic’ label often given to anyone who merely discusses or debates the situation and history of Israel/Palestine has also become rather defunct considering that the Semitic label refers to people who are from and speak a family of languages native to the Middle East and Western Asia which includes ancient Phoenician as well as the later Hebrew and Arabic languages .
British Israelite movements seen in the last few centuries seem to continue to attempt to sell an Anglo-Israeli version of history that conflates ‘British’ with ‘English’, failing to grasp that British in its true sense means Khumric/Welsh Britons with a shared common language of Cymraeg/Welsh – a language steeped in the history of Britain, Europe and it seems, Egypt, Palestine and the Middle East. Professor John Morris Jones wrote a thesis in 1898 that demonstrated how the complex Khumric syntax and that of ancient Egypt were identical, with the same seven vowels – AEIOUWY – used in ancient Egypt and Cymraeg.
Wilson asks:
“So why has this centuries long Anti-British conspiracy aimed at the total destruction of the history, the heritage, and the culture of the native British people which is the inalienable property of all of us who are British by descent and/or birth, been carried on?
“What are the Church of Rome and the London Establishment of its Monarchy and Church so afraid of that they determinedly conspire to destroy the rightful inheritance of the British Nation?”
He and other historians such as Michael A Clark believe that one of the main reasons for the conspiracy is that, following the collapse of a religious-political movement in Jerusalem in AD 35, the group known as The Holy Family, led by a certain Joseph of Arimeathea (later known as St Ilid), packed up, left Jerusalem and sailed to Britain knowing that their ancient kinsmen, the Khumry, who would have been in Britain for at least 500 years prior, would give them refuge and protect them.
A young man going by the name of Iesu Grist/Jesus Christ is also claimed to have visited Britain in his youth, and is also buried in Britain according to Wilson.
The disproportionate number of place names in Wales that have Israelite origins also tends to lend a certain weight to the history of the Khumry and the twelve lost tribes hypothesis in a biblical/Israelite context: Bethesda, Hebron, Hermon, Bethel etc.
According to Wilson:
“The First Christian Church was established in Khumric Wales in AD 35 -‘the last year of Tiberius and this was attested to by Cardinal Baronius, the learned Vatican Librarian, as a direct result of his researches around 1535. This original Apostolic Christianity was taken to Rome from Britain in AD 51 when the Apostolic Christian family of King Caradog travelled to the Italian capital where Caradog’s son Linus became the first bishop of Rome.
“Caradog’s daughter, Princess Eurgain married Rufus Pudens who appears in Biblical records – he also left a memorial stone at the Palace of the traitor King Cogidubnus. The evidence is considerable.”
Wilson comments that this very definitely contradicts the claims of the Church of Rome that Peter and Paul founded the Western Church in Rome, both of whom incidentally arrived in Rome at separate times much later.
So there is an immediate problem with Roman Catholicism and the original Apostolic Christian Church according Wilson and Blackett’s work. These major problems increase when the detail of the original British Apostolic Christianity stemming directly from the Holy Family, its founder and his followers in Britain, is compared with that of Rome.
In other words, The Khumric Welsh took Christianity to Rome, not the other way round.
If this is correct it turns all known European history on its head, spins it sideways and kicks it into oblivion. No wonder the London establishment and media act so peculiarly when it comes to Wales and the Welsh language, bizarrely undermining a crucial part of their own Brythonic heritage in the process.
If Christianity was taken to Rome from Wales by the Khumric Welsh, this, as mentioned, virtually demolishes the pretensions of the Church of Rome.
This version of British history – and the suggested ancient lineage of the Welsh Khumry being the original lost tribes of Israel – is obviously damaging to the pretensions of the puppet English Monarchy and is further potentially problematic to aspects of modern Israeli political power ambitions.
Maybe affectionate descriptions of the Welsh language being the ‘language of heaven’ are also a further vexation to those wishing to claim and exercise absolute religious and monarchical authority.
As Wilson states:
“It is time to tell the truth. The whole truth, and nothing but the truth. We are dealing with the biggest pack of political and religious lies in the history of the world.”
Meanwhile the Cymric people have somehow managed to retain their timeless language, values and sense of place and purpose whilst still reaching out and connecting themselves to the whole world.
Perhaps the people of Wales, past and present, have always known that they have been fighting dark political and spiritual powers.
So could the Welsh Britons be the Khumric lost Ten Tribes of Israel?
Yes they could is the simple answer. More debate and discussion of the various evidence and possibilities is certainly needed.
But generations of a collective national memory still exist and, when added to the increasing amount of credible evidence, the suspicion must be that this is a distinct if not very likely possibility. History, as always, is in the making.
Wilson and Blackett have written more than 11 books on British Welsh history which can be brought from most online platforms. There are also countless videos and DVDs of their work available online, most of them free to watch. Or for further information and prices contact one of their main retailers here or contact: richard@richplanet.net
sovereignwales.com 
Thank you! So let´s spread Alan´s work!
I agree m’dear ! This man, Alan Wilson, is the most important man in all of Ancient British History: his work is outstanding, thorough and TRUE !
[…] Source: Are the Welsh the lost ten tribes of Israel? […]
Very interesting! Can you say where the Alan Wilson quotations came from – which book, or are they from several of his books, or talks? What I’m really asking is: which of his books would be a good starting point for this area of research?
Thanks!
Hi, the Alan Wilson quotations are from numerous sources, articles, talks and correspondence. You can see/buy the books they’ve written covering these areas here: http://www.richplanet.net/catalog/index.php?cPath=59 ‘The Discovery of the Ark of the Covenant’ (written under an alias) is probably a good place to start if wanting to cover the early middle east origins.
There’s a lot of various articles online by them as well as videos on You tube etc. This is a good You Tube channel dedicated to real Brythonic history: https://www.youtube.com/user/RealBritishHistory/videos
This site also has some excellent articles on true Brythonic and pre Roman history: http://www.thenationalcv.org.uk/more.html And this one (although the design is not very clear) http://treasure1.tripod.com/index.html
Thanks!
Have read a couple of Wilson and Blackett’s books , really interesting ,
not seen anywhere yet though their translation of the Lemnos Stele.
with the connection to Aeneas , King Latinus , Brutus etc have started
to wonder if Latinus , and La-Tene (celts) and Latins may be connected
somehow.
Re Welsh and ten tribes..in Layamons Brut , where it talks about Conan
being given land in Gaul to settle , on one page it makes a Froidian slip
and calls Conan…. Canaan.
I wonder if Alan or Baram have ever read the Oera Linda Book which
may be of some interest to them
If you’re thinking of taking the world of Welsh history by storm then I suggest that you don’t give up the day job. I’d also suggest that you reconsider calling Wilson and Blackett ‘historians’ for they are far from being that.
However, your piece did give me a few chuckles, and the notion of Queen Elizabeth 1 claiming the whole of North America for Britain is a bit ludicrous given that she’d been dead for 192 years by the time that John Evans set of on his journey. He didn’t find the Welsh speaking Indians simply because they didn’t exist. You’d be far better off watching Gruff Rhys’ ‘American Interior if you want an accurate, if somewhat eccentric account of John Evans’ exploration.
http://american-interior.com/
As far as the Madog myth is concerned, you’d be well advised to read the late Gwyn A Williams book ‘Madoc: The making of a myth’ (1979) also ‘The Search for Beulah Land’ (1980). In both of those books the author deals with the story of the Welsh and the Americas, in a highly readable and informative manner. Gwyn A Williams was also a professor of Welsh history at Cardiff University.
For a reliable overview of Welsh history, you could do a lot worse than avail yourself of a copy of ‘When Was Wales? (1985) , again by Gwyn A Williams, or Dr John Davies’ ‘A History of Wales’ (1994).
You spend a lot of time discussing the Arthurian romance, which is of course particularly relevant to Wales, but again I don’t think Wilson and Blackett are the best to read on this. There are far more reliable sources of information available, far too many to list, as it’s a very researched area, However, again the late Gwyn A Williams comes to the rescue with his ‘Excalibur: the Search for Arthur’, (1994).
The idea that the Welsh are descended from the ten lost tribes of Israel is not a new one, and goes back to at least the sixteenth century when historians at the time were beginning to consider the origins of the Welsh. I doubt that there is any truth in those stories, but the study of those ideas does make for some interesting reading!
It’s also important to have a caveat in one’s mind when considering those peoples called ‘Celts’. Much confusion has been caused by those considering the Celts as a racial, i.e. genetic group rather than an ethnic, i.e. cultural grouping. Even within the so called Celtic cultures there was considerable diversity, hence La Tene and Halstatt, as well as other Celtic cultures such as Belgic. Even within the islands of Britain, Celtic cultures varied considerbly, with some tribes living a ‘civilised’ life in towns using coinage. A good author to read about these societies is none other than Julius Caesar in his ‘The Gallic Wars’.
Thanks for pointing out the dates – it’s now been corrected and expanded on to explain how Elizabeth the 1st and John Dee are very relevant to this point of a pre Columbus ‘British’ (Welsh) claim on north America by Madog and Brenin Arthur. John Evans only explored one small area looking for one tribe (the Mandan), mainly following the upper Missouri river.He did not set out to find all the areas with well documented claims of Welsh speaking locals – in Virginia, north Carolina, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana and Florida to name but a few.The evidence from numerous American literature referred to in the article of Welsh speaking Indian tribes would suggest that this claim of Welsh speaking Indians is far from being baloney. The American Interior film following the John Evans trail is a great film but is a light artistic take on John Evans and not meant as a full blown historical study on the subject at large – the film also leaves any general conclusions open ended.
You mention John Davies’ excellent (some would say definitive) book ‘A history of Wales’ – a great source I agree and one of the sources that was used for the article. John Davies also alludes to Brutus of Troy coming to Britain in around 1170 BC in this book – also adding that the Welsh/Britons could well have been in Britain much earlier as well. I’d say that the genetic as well as historical evidence of the Britons/Brythoniaid being the lost tribes (or a large contingent of them) is pretty strong, with the American connection also being very plausible. I think it’s important to use as many credible sources as possible to put a case across, as hopefully this article does in substantiating a great deal of what Wislon and Blackett state. Perhaps relying on only one author such as Gwyn Alf as isn’t particulary healthy and re reading the article might help to open some new doors and possibilities etc?
The point you raise about the term ‘Celts’ and ”Celtic’ is looked at in the article, around a third way down
Wilson and Blackett are NOT historians. They make many wild, unsubstantiated claims, and much of the ‘evidence’ they have supposedly uncovered was allegedly planted by them.
Wilson and Blackett are on the lunatic fringe when it comes to history. Anyone seeing them as ‘credible’ undermines their own credibility.
Might you be able to give an example and provide evidence for these alleged unsubstantiated claims as well as any evidence to back up your claim that evidence was allegedly planted by them? It’s a pretty big accusation to make and it would be only fair for you to back this up with your own evidence to support your claim.
On a general point, I wouldn’t personally over rely on any single historian – surely it’s best to study the work of as many varied historians as possible in order to cross reference information and get as close a picture to the truth as possible. No historian is going to be correct all the time, that’s a given. When it comes to the lost tribes hypothesis, Wilson and Blackett’s work can largely be corroborated by the work of others through history and by recent genetic evidence. This doesn’t mean that it’s an open and shut case of course but it’s good to see that this history is being looked at again properly after being disregarded and swept under the carpet by the non Brittonic London establishment in recent centuries
Please provide evidence of anything “planted”
You are stranded upon the POSTAGE STAMP of academic NONSENSE. We have our Coelbren language, so, do not bother to write further unless you can translate the cipher AND illustrate PROOF.
You must work for the security services.
How can the Welsh be descendant from the lost ten tribes in 1500bc when Moses was receiving the Ten Commandments in 1500bc, and the tribes weren’t “lost” until the Assyrian invasion in roughly 750bc?
The hypothesis is that the ten lost tribes that arrived in Britain from 500 BC onwards were re joined with their kinsmen who were already in Britain and who were descended from earlier Phoenicians/Mesopotamians and who shared the same culture, language and bloodlines as the later Israelite lost tribes. The Phoenicians traded extensively between Britain, Europe and the middle east so this is not such a stretch of the imagination. There are also plausible further claims that the Phoenicians were based in Britain from the earliest times and travelled outward from Britain to the middle east rather than the other way round
Cannabis use has recently been legalised in Israel – I didn’t know that it had been in Wales too! But please, use it sparingly and drive and blog after the influence passes!
Thank you for your very kind advice and concern. Nothing much stronger than a few pints of ale and some Roquefort cheese biscuits are consumed on these premises however
Finally the truth. The language connection in Hebrew-Welsh is compelling. I am to visit a monastery in St David in Arizona. This is their history that they need to know. This is major.
“Jesus Christ is also ‘buried’ in Britain according to Wilson….” Seriously?? Wilson is a professional historian, and peddles that kind of unhistorical rubbish? It’s outrageous. Very few credentialed historians would touch that with a twenty foot pole. It’s akin to saying that Jesus never lived.
The real Jesus; the Messiah…according to all historical records–and Scripture–tell us plainly that He died by crucifixion outside the city walls of Jerusalem; in a place called Golgotha. He was buried in a rich man’s tomb…The tomb was sealed by Roman guards–and the tomb was empty on the third day. Jesus told the unbelieving priests; “Destroy this temple (his body), and in three days I will raise it up.” They thought he was crazy. (“It took forty years to build this (Jewish) Temple. How then can he say that he will destroy it, and re-build it in three days?” On Resurrection morning; the Sanhedrin (priests) bribed the guards with money, and told them to say that “His disciples came while we slept, and stole his body.” Clearly; he was put to death in Jerusalem.
The tomb was empty. That is an historical fact. Following the Resurrection; He appeared first to the women, and then to his disciples. He also appeared to five hundred people in one gathering. No serious scholars–Christian or otherwise–dispute these facts.
For two thousand years; skeptics have tried in vain to discredit the Resurrection. For millennia skeptics have tried to discredit, and destroy; the Bible. They are all dead; the Bible remains.
Jesus fulfilled more than three hundred Old Testament prophecies. The Scriptures are pregnant with Messianic prophecy–They were fulfilled literally; in history. Some await a future fulfillment. Isaiah 53 describes the Suffering Servant. Psalm 22; a Psalm of David; describes his crucifixion. Check it for yourself. A copy of the Book of Isaiah is on display in Jerusalem. Archeologists and other experts date it to at least one hundred years before Christ. It’s almost word for word in agreement with our Bibles.
Jesus came as the Lamb of God; to die for your sins, and mine. As St. Paul wrote; “If Christ be not raised (from the dead) your faith is in vain; you are yet in your sins.” He said then–as he says now–“I am the Resurrection, and the Life.” “I am the Way; the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father but by me.” There is no other way that God has provided. As he said to the crowds; “Before Abraham was born ; I AM.” “If you do not believe that I Am; you will die in your sins.” (“I Am that I AM”…the eternal God. “Immanuel; God with us.”
He lived; was crucified, and rose again….in time and space. This is verifiable history. He ministered in the Holy Land for three years. Also verifiable history. He was crucified, and rose on the third day. He appeared–in flesh and bone–for forty days. He then ascended–witnessed by his disciples–into Heaven.
John 3:16: “For God so loved the world (you) that he gave his only begotten son; that whosoever believes in him shall not perish; but have everlasting life.”
You cannot pay for your sins. Ever. Jesus paid the price for you. He tells us that “Whoever comes to me I will not turn away.”
Belief is not a “leap in the dark.” On the contrary…The facts are there to be examined. Believe means to turn to Him with even a tiny faith, and ask him for forgiveness. He will forgive, and give you everlasting life. A “new creation; born of the Spirit.” Not simply patched up; but made new. Forgiven; a newly born (spiritually) child of God.
It’s your choice. It’s a decision that will last eternally; in light; or in darkness. Choose life.
Thank you for this. I don’t recall Alan Wilson refuting the resurrection of Jesus Christ but you’ll have to take up this particular point with Alan Wilson himself! Perhaps the possibility that Jesus visited Britain in his youth is more credible? Perhaps also easier to substantiate is the claim that, following the collapse of a religious-political movement in Jerusalem in AD 35, the group known as The Holy Family, led by a certain Joseph of Arimeathea (later known as St Ilid), packed up, left Jerusalem and sailed to Britain. This is something other historians such as Michael A Clark also claim-please see link here: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/christian-icon-joseph-arimathea-could-5164183
Oh dear. Stuck on the POSTAGE STAMP of ignorance are you ? Get real and try to learn something instead of repeating your pathetic nonsense.
We are the Cimmeroi of our Brythonic islands. You are not welcome on our islands.
Hi Professor Wilson,
interesting article about Khrimic background of King Arthur, Khumry is a region of the present day North of Armenia, was also know as Kumairi, Gumri the ancient land of the Armens, the people there still carve what you would call Celtic crosses from stones and have some interesting ancient traditions. It is a good possibility that they are from the same tribe.
I’ve heard about this connection to Armenia before, very interesting. Surely there’s a genuine connection and it may well be that the Khumric/modern Welsh people left their mark/culture/language/people there as they traveled from the middle east and in to Europe as is alleged
(PS – this site isn’t run by Alan Wilson! The best place to get hold of him would be through the Richplanet site http://www.richplanet.net/)
Greeting Cymrusofren,
Sean Cowie of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, My Mother nee name HOWELL and my Great Grandmother nee name GRIFFITH both names came from Wales,Right but may be Descentants from Ancients King Hywell (Howell) and King Gruffudd (Griffith) both Royal Tribe of Wales Rhodri Mawr ? also cousins King Arthur and Prince Madog ? also Joseph of Armethea and Nathan and King David of Israel and the lost of Israel.? May be you know better than me so please let me know if it is right. I will try to get DNA.
Thanks.
Thanks for this, best place to start looking and get help on this would probably be the National Library of Wales: https://www.library.wales/index.php?id=1
There’s no way the Welsh or any other modern day European fit Deut 28 blessings and cursing nor the Semetic E1B1a DNa phenotype. The bible is the AfroAmerican history book maligned by Whitewashing of HiStory.
Hebrews ruled Europa through
the Dark Ages as well as discovered America per II Edras 13:40-45… The Jew Christopher Columbus used II Edras to discover Arzareth ie Arzot haBrit aka Land of the Covenant where the Assyrian captives migrated to Turtle 🐢 Island, Tupac Amaruca, Amuurika, Morocco or No Man’s Land. We ruled Europe were Vikings, Celts, Saxons, Knights Templars, Iberians.
https://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/the-lost-moorish-igbo-israelites-of-sao-tome-the-hebrew-tribes-of-biafra-by-iroabuchi/
http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1970/10/22/did-hebrews-discover-america-pshould-we/
http://www.therealhebrewisraelites.com
Hi, could you kindly repeat this in an understandable way please-either in the English language or the British language (Welsh)?
ONLY the White, Celtic and kindred peoples fit Deuteronomy 28. Period. Its historical fact.
Africans fit no description of anything in the Bible other than maybe ‘beasts of the field’. You are so deluded by your jewish masters that it is almost hilarious.
“We wuz kangs , an shit…” Right?
LOL!
What a shame to forsake the Celtic heritage and birthright in favour of this serpentine hebrew fan fiction. Nothing is more vile than Jews and the tainted touch. It suits them and all gentile fools swooned by the ‘romantic’ ideologies and revisions thrown their way. In the same way generational African Americans obsess over their alleged ancestral lineage with the Pharaohs, those of us in the Isles who have lost our cultural hegemony fawn over this, our unique snowflake complex at work. It is true that we have become anodyne, spiritually neutered from our traditions and ways, as have many others experienced in Western Europe. But substituting this with revision and make believe is not the answer, we may never know what is truly certain as the sands of time favour the ones who turn the hourglass. But the one thing I know is that hand often belongs to God’s Chosen People, the tribe of Israel, Cabal of Satan and it’s many other illustrious titles. They are not to be trusted and never have been, they have been expelled from countless countries, nations and empires since before recorded history and many of those being of Celtic origin specifically. All peoples have been at odds and for good reason, it is their nature to undermine, to deceive, to misdirect, to colonise, to succeed, but it is also our right to exist without their poison. We have spent millennia as a European people divided and conquered by one another, the axe has been swung, the bowstring drawn and the damage done. But now in the world of the today we face division and conquer tactics on a whole new level, a global one that risks the genocide of an entire European haplogroup. Bloodlines as far back as the very fables we indulge ourselves in, easily bred out and tarred for eternity. This eventuality is not yet accepted by the many let alone the few, we only recognise damage until it is done and for those who are uninitiated in the Jewish Question, you can whole heatedly believe that the true descendants of the Tribes of Israel are the manufacturers of the events that are leading to this very eventuality. Do not forget yourself or your people, the nature of truth is at odds with the modern age but it still exists and is accessible in spite of the conditioning we receive.
“But now in the world of the today we face division and conquer tactics on a whole new level, a global one that risks the genocide of an entire European haplogroup” – I’d agree with that point – please see the post on the Kalergi Plan for European peoples and nations on here. William Carr makes the point in Pawns in the Game that the rot lies with the Pharisees-the false priests and money lenders who have deceivingly and parasitically embedded themselves within the Israelite (and Judean tribe/religion especially) for their own evil agendas of world rule and control. History has been spun and written by the rulers for sure, and the real truth of all our histories may yet not be clear. In terms of the indigenous Britons/Welsh, Celts and/or Europeans generally, what would be your take on the true history be?
Who can say, I don’t think I can answer that here in one post let alone an entire page. What I can answer is that the real truth is not clear now and painfully never will be. We move further from the truth each day, the connections are lost the ages and the importance of preserving it in it’s entirety has become non-existent.
One thing is certain, it’s a history destined to be overwritten and completely forgotten. The ‘problematic’ reality that our ‘true history’ and traditions evoke an instinctual sense of ethnic identity and nationalism make it so we only get a glimpse at what it considered an theatrical display of our history. It is shown as if it were a diorama contained in thick glass, primarily taught on a depersonalised level, with the intention to reduce bridging the ancestral gap to us.
To the few who might find fascination in our story, despite the contemporary intention to deprive us of that motivation, we must tackle with the folly of history itself, revisionists who copy other revisionists, who copy other revisionists. Unfortunately each revisionist also has an opinion and an agenda which leeches into their work. This is the self inflicted suicide of historical truth, we are constantly reinventing the past so the subject can remain relevant in the present.
We once had an innate connection with our history, but we moved from oral traditions to illuminated writings. We became reliant on material and forsook the necessity to retain it. This is just a natural evolution and it would have been fine as long as the material had integrity and was protected. But the drawback is we don’t have the real truth of our history.
What we have access to now is just fact. This is a Celt, this is where they come from, where they ended up, what they spoke, what they did, what they became. It’s a brief generalisation but applicable to all peoples history, with the exception that some peoples have still retained their oral principles, and for them their history isn’t inaccessible or distant to them but present and accounted for.
The modern world is one is subversion and depersonalisation, but we aren’t completely neutered yet, for lack of a better word. Although we may be conditioned from an early age and given consistent programming throughout our waking life, there is still that instinctual twinge to push us in certain directions and ask certain questions. It can be easily put to rest when hitting a dead end though, and that is what our history is full of, dead ends. Unfortunately that is also what our future is becoming too as any course intended to undo this shift, to reinvigorate our people and culture is ultimately becoming a taboo process, besides what little we know of our ‘true history’ now will become isolated within each of us until we pass into our graves, just like the generation before us did.
Interesting, thanks. I wouldn’t say it’s a no hoper though. I see a swelling of ‘awakening’ (that word!) by the silent majority of the people who know what’s going on and who see through globalist plans to destroy all the diversity of the histories, traditions and uniqueness of all the nations and peoples on earth. There may be a missing generation of indoctrinated and zombified, technologised children but there’s always the next generation, and the one after
Although I greatly admire Alan Wilson and baram Blackett’s work, they seem to restrict the northern ten tribes of Israel to Britain(and italy) all Aryan people’s from Britain, USA, Canada, north-western Europe, south Africa, Australia and New Zealand are Israelites.
I have just found out with doing my family tree my family tree goes from my 5th great grandfather called Richard Williams his direct line goes threw the Kings and Princes of Wales leading to
King of Britain Heli Beli Mawr “the Great” Of The Britons now he Married a woman called Anna who was from the tribe of Judah whos family goes threw Christs Family then if you look at the bible you can get the family tree that goes back to King David then onto Adam . I do beleive that the Welsh go back to the tribes of Israel , Britian ,Scottland and Ireland to, then onto the rest of the world.If anyone wants to argue against Alan I would invite you to look at my family tree
There have been people in comment section viciously attacking this work and research with no real argument or evidence to blow Alan and Baram out of the waters. This actually didn’t make me angry but made me laugh hard because if you were to even humour it for a second you’d realise that a lot of what the research is pointing to actually has quite sturdy foundations. To be Frank the attack almost seems quite desperate to the point it almost reaffirms the research.
Amazing work and the mainstream way of getting information (manipulating information) is slowly becoming irrelevant and has reduced the influence of these so called gate keepers of “real” information of history ie BBC, Oxford, Cambridge.
“Sturdy foundations” – are you serious? On the rare occasions that W & B ever provide precise sources (eg Caesar on the Brythonic/ Coelbren alphabet), these turn out to be lies or laughable mis-translations. There are many honest, non-establishment Welsh historians who are not part of some giant “establishment conspiracy” against our BNP heroes Blackett and Wilson – and they wouldn’t touch this duo and their ridiculous fabrications with a barge-pole either.
Wilson and Blackett are charlatans who specialise in ridiculous theories based on laughably inaccurate translations of languages and interpretations of texts that they do not understand. They are also British Nationalists – and former BNP candidates when living in Newcastle – whose hatred of the Irish people’s struggle for freedom leads them to deny any Celtic connection between Wales (the “pure British”) and Ireland. Their utter ignorance of the Welsh and Irish Gaelic languages and their antecedents even leads them to deny any common linguistic root. Their bogus claims about Julius Caesar and a Brythonic alphabet – and much else besides – is exposed for all to read here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.legend.king-arthur/R4mpR_CddnE%5B1-25%5D
No wonder their ridiculous nonsense is promoted by Richplanet – a major site promoting all the maddest and vilest conspiracy theories under the sun. Reactionary trash, the lot of it. But don’t take my word on it … read this thread. There’s plenty more elsewhere.
Truth hurts, huh? While there are indeed problems of some denying the fact that the Irish and the Welsh and true Brits are of the same basic Israelite stock, it certainly has no bearing on this essay. Knocking the truths therein defines you as an enemy of these peoples.
How’s the weather in tel aviv today, clown?
[…] NOTE: Republished from sovereignwales.com. I didn’t ask their permission since they had republished it from the Daily Wales news site […]