Tag: Rosa Koire

‘Replacement Migration’ – The deranged globalist plan by the UN and EU to bring in 56 million people from outside of Europe in to Europe by 2050

The west especially has only recently come round to having rational considered discusions on immigration and immigration numbers. But the people of the west have to wake up because now the plan is to have them completely replaced. And there are similar plans for the rest of the world as well

 

As mentioned in a previous article, natural and sustainable immigration happens organically. Economic immigrants, whether legal or not, can’t really be blamed or demonised for looking for a better quality of life.

And genuine asylum seekers who escape war zones and civil wars created by any aggressor including western/Nato countries should expect our sympathy and help, and be given refuge in the nearest safe country or countries as set out in international law. Furthermore, any person from any ethnicity, background or race should of course be free to choose to be with, love and settle with whomever they want in accordance with whatever the citizenship laws of any particular country might be.

But it isn’t that simple. Sadly there are political leaders and planners who seek to create and use mass immigration and the forced movement of people for their own nefarious purposes.

Replacement Migration’ is an official published plan to deliberately bring in at least 56 million people from mostly Africa to Europe by 2050. It’s a very real policy that’s already been planned by both the UN and EU since at least the year 2000 – a policy carried out under the auspices of various inter connected globalist agencies and ‘Non Governmental agencies’ such as the International Organisation for Migration, Global Migration Group, The Africa-EU Partnership, World Bank and the cult of international sustainable development also known as Agenda 21/2030 Agenda.

Mass enforced immigration is recognised by the UN itself as an incitement to genocide as defined by the United Nations even though the UN themselves as well as the EU are proponents of the Replacement Migration plan.

And on December 19th 2018 a worldwide agreement called The Global Compact for Migration was also signed in Marakesh. It essentially gives equal rights to all migrants from across the world to migrate to anywhere they want, whether they are legal or not. The agreement was put in place by the UN and, for all intents and purposes, outlaws any sctrutinising or questioning of the plan or of the immigrants themselves by those countries who have signed or by media groups or press within those countries. In the finest Orwellian tradition, any public funding for these press and media groups is recommended to be stopped if they stray from the narrative or ask ‘difficult’ questions when it come to immigration.

Luckily, not all countries have signed this grubby globalist plan. 152 countries voted in favour of the resolution to endorse it, while the United States, Hungary, Israel, Czech Republic and Poland voted against it, and 12 countries including Australia, Switzerland, Chile, Brazil, Estonia, Italy, Bulgaria, Dominican republic and Latvia abstained. 24 countries didn’t vote at all and many of the countries who have signed may yet change their minds. A petition of 130,000 signatures to the UK parliament asking for a parliamentary discussion on the matter was ignored even though the parliament is obliged to discuss any petition with over 100,000 signatures.

The carrying out of this agenda has been hovering around for years. Prior to 1999 the net immigration numbers in to the UK state ranged from between 0 to 50,000 per year. From 1999 onwards, following a Labour-led policy under globalist grinning puppet Tony Blair to open the flow of doors to immigrants to Britain, this figure has been closer to 300,000 net a year – an absurd figure equivalent to a new city around the size of Coventry each year. Whatever happens between the UK state and the EU, it’s likely that those in power will continue to try and push for disproportionate mass immigration in to the UK and elsewhere. But all politicans can be voted out which is why non political people have to start standing as representatives instead, and the secretive civil service culture disbanded.

Those who have looked in to these things in depth will know that both the EU and UN were started and supported by internationalist bankers and financiers right from the very start. Robert Schumann, Jean Monnet and the international bankers who started the EU, stated from the beginning that the EU was to be a centralised supranational body. The EU’s first founding president of the highest body of the EU, the EU Commission, was Walter Hallstein – a prominent law professor under the Nazis. How was it possible that such a man could become the “founding father” of the Brussels EU?

In his book the The Invisible College author William Stuart states that the documented inspiration to those involved with setting up the EU and plans for a proposed one world government goes way back to Freemasons Albert Pike and Giusseppe Mazzini in the late 19th century, and that the later instigators were also affiliated and working in parallel with the Freemason Count Coudenhove-Kalergi – he of the maniacal Kalergi plan to destroy all the peoples and nations of Europe through mass enforced migration from outside of Europe – sadly not a conspiracy theory but a documented plan as explained in his “Praktischer Idealismus,” (Practical Idealism) book and the Pan European movement of the 1920’s, supported by the financial elite.

Such plans go against all notions of equality and the celebration of diversity of course. Such plans are a deliberate attack on the very notion of diversity – a “Mein Kampf” in reverse. Ethnocidal based European unification and the union of other Orwellian world regions would likely be the first steps in creating an eventual world government, potentially under the UN or a similar unelected global body.

What Kalergi openly called for was not only the destruction of European nation states but also the deliberate ethnocide of the indigenous, mostly Caucasian race of the European continent. Another reason why this is a serious concern stems from the fact that every year, in his honour, the European Union bestows the Coudenove-Kalergi prize to “Europeans who have excelled in promoting European integration.” This is done officially under the name of The Charlemagne Prize. Recent winners of the award have been such moral luminaries as Angela Merkel, Herman Van Rompuy, Tony Blair and Henry Kissinger.

The Replacment Migration for Europe plan seems to simply be a continuation of the Kalergi plan. No race or peoples are safe from this crazed global unification policy. It’s proposed that other continents and races will then follow until there is a one global homogeneous uniform mass of people in serfdom to the self appointed elite, and all the beautiful diversity of nations, peoples and races on earth are destroyed.

This is sadly no joke. Frans Timmermans,  First Vice-President of the European Commission and European Commissioner for Better Regulation, Interinstitutional Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights, would agree it seems.

Whether Kalergi or anyone else’s vision is being followed word for word or not perhaps is not the main issue. Mass and disproportionate movement of people in to Europe is happening whether we believe it or not. And most are economic migrants not refugees.

Once those genuinely fleeing wars arrive at the nearest safe country and are given sanctuary as they should, they can claim refugee status. This is why aid from Britain and Europe is much better spent on helping those in need in these safe haven countries nearest to conflict zones such as Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. But if those claiming to be refugees then insist on moving on to other countries that they have their eye on then they become self chosen economic migrants.

It was reported that more than a million recorded people reached Europe through irregular means in 2015 when it seemes that a literal invasion was at its most obvious. According to Frans Timmerman once more, (Vice-President of the European Commission), it’s estimated that around 60% of those coming in to Europe from the Middle East and Africa are economic migrants using asylum-seeker status as a cover. Even this 60% figure seems to be a conservative estimate from looking at other various reports.

It’s long puzzled many how so many poverty stricken refugees escaping from war-torn countries can afford to pay the 10,000 or so Euros needed to cross the Mediterranean into Europe. Austrian intelligence officials have revealed that US government agencies are paying for the transport of a great deal of these migrants in to Europe. On August 5th, 2015 Austrian magazine Infodirekt reported:

“It has come to our knowledge that US organisations are paying for the boats taking thousands of refugees to Europe. US organisations have created a co-financing scheme which provides for a considerable portion of the transportation costs. Not every refugee from North Africa has 11,000 Euro cash. Nobody is asking, where is the money coming from?”

French government officials and Turkish authorities are also reported to have been caught red handed selling life boats and equipment to refugees in Turkey.

Billionaire George Soros, alleged funder of numerous revolutionary ‘springs’ and movements including the divisive race baiters Black Lives Matter in the USA – he who also has a global network of non-governmental organisation (NGO) fronts operating under his Open Society Foundations – recently insisted that the European Union should spend a further 10 billion Euros to facilitate the movement of more than a million mainly ‘Muslim refugees’ into Europe every year from now on.

Brussels seems to be complying with the instructions of this self-appointed global Tsar. According to renowned Irish journalist Gearóid Ó Colmáin, the company that would mostly benefit from this increased EU spending is Equistone Partners Europe, an affiliate of the Rothschild-owned Barclays Bank.

Reports also allege that geopolitical meddling have helped to create the sudden mass movements of people in general, allowing for the resulting integration of ISIS/ISIL members in to the mass of economic migrants and asylum seekers arriving in Europe. The end outcome being the potential chaos and clash of civilisations and religions that we have already seen glimpses of.

It’s a claim substantiated by numerous other sources reporting that thousands of covert trained fighters have been successfully smuggled in to Europe posing as migrants – the full amount being impossible to determine at this stage

None of this should really be that much of a surprise considering that it’s by now being widely reported that it was the USA, Israel, the UK and their allies who created Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood in the first place  – something author William Stuart also covers in details in his book ‘The Invisible College: 911 to Armageddon’. And the illegal attacks led by a small crazed Anglo-American-Israeli elite seen in recent years on majority Muslim countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya has also conveniently led to the radicalisation of many of the men and women of those countries – a large proportion of whom are now intent on revenge through the bloody destruction of the west by war or invasion.

It could be easily surmised that this has played beautifully in to the hands of those globalist elements who themselves want to see Europe destroyed by a clash of civilisations as the Kalergi plan and the Replacement Migration plan also lays out. In other words – the radical Muslims and mass of migrants have been played as much as we Europeans have. Divide and conquer, play both sides and all that. It’s said that all modern wars are banker wars. Perhaps it would be an idea for all divided enemies to start talking to each other and to look at who all the vested interests pulling all these strings might be and ask why are they doing it?

It’s commonly alleged by renowned historians such as Anthony C Sutton, Carroll Quigley, William Stuart and many others that it was also the internationalist banking fraternity based out of Wall street and the City of London who, directly and indirectly,funded the murderous and genocidal Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917 as well as the rise of Hitler and the Nazi Germany regime in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Together with the first world war, these led to the deaths of hundreds of millions people.

It’s also public knowledge by now that it was to the globalist banker Lord Rothschild that British government foreign secretary Arthur James Balfour bizarrely ‘promised’ the whole of Palestine in his infamous Balfour declaration letter of November 2nd 1917, not to any nation or peoples.

Natural and sustainable immigration occurs in to all countries and every country on earth has an indisputable right to control immigration numbers in to their countries based on their own capabilities and needs. And all peoples and nations have the right to preserve the characteristics and fundamental features of their civic identity as well as their indigenous and historical ethno – cultural identity, especially so if these things are under obvious, disproportionate and intentional threat.

This is recognised by international anti genocide and anti ethnocide laws and by basic morality, decency and common sense. Examples of these fundamental rights can be seen in Japan, in Israel, in Asiatic countries, in African countries, and in recent laws created for native Americans. But this debate really should be about numbers and proportionality of immigration numbers – it doesn’t have to be about race, ethnicity or nationality.

But immigration only works if the immigration numbers are sustainable, occur organically and are in keeping with the needs and capabilities of the host nation. That and ensuring that there is enough time and resources for new citizens to assimilate and become productive members of their new societies.

When the numbers are disproportionate, unnaturally forced or out of control, there will inevitably be tensions and effects on jobs and wages, on public services and on society at large. Nobody wins.

Racial incitement to hatred and violence from across the whole political spectrum should be tackled whenever it occurs. But the racism of those globalist ‘open border’ political leaders that deliberately inflict disproportionate mass migration on any country without the agreement of that country and its people should be tackled equally.

As importantly, all matters to do with diversity in the form of race, culture, religion and nationality should be rationally discussed, debated and understood rather than brushed under the carpet and treated as if they are things that don’t exist at all.

But in Britain, Europe and the west generally, extreme politically correct indoctrination by the media and the education system has been so effective that many people self identifying as progressive liberals refuse to recognise the issues that mass unfettered and open border immigration can cause to any country if not tackled with a rational and balanced approach. The narrative being created and pushed obsesses on, forces and fetishises the whole issue to be about race and skin colour, polarising and framing all arguments based on this predisposition.

And the snobbery, contempt, and derisiveness shown by the liberal elite towards Britonnic and European citizens of all races and creed who have a rational and legitimate concern about unlimited immigration, also shows how disconnected the political system is from the public and Realpolitik in general. The inverted racism and polarised views of this liberal  elite are perfectly demonstrated by the fact that they seem to believe that it’s only the pink/white citizens of Britain and Europe who have concerns about unlimited immigration in to their countries.

And there is another deeply flawed double standard in the argument for enforced unlimited immigration and multiculturalism. A great deal of the world’s non-European populations are mono cultural/mono racial. Why aren’t self proclaimed progressives insisting that these countries should be forced to accept open door immigration, to become more multicultural and more ethnically diverse? Why aren’t they demanding that China, Japan, Israel, Saudi Arabia and African countries become unquestioning multi cultural and multi racial societies? Why is it that, at the present time, it’s only the indigenous European nations that should unequivocally accept enforced unlimited immigration and multiculturalism?

Many will protest to rightly defend Tibet and Palestine from displacement and colonisation because the liberal progressive media has told them that this is acceptable to do. But the same people won’t defend the same rights held by European nations. Here the inconsistency and hypocrisy of enforced immigration and multiculturalism is exposed.

According to the logic of many self appointed ‘progressives’, this picture of an illegal invasion is ‘racist’ because it shows mostly black Africans (mostly young men). Never mind that they’re inavding a continet illegally. Yes, a picture of black people is inherently racist in their view. Which seems to make the people saying it’s racist the racists.

And these same blinkered and brainwashed people fail to comprehend that the caucasian white/pink race is also an ethnic minority in the world – only making up around 11% of the world’s total population; a figure that seems to be decreasing year on year.

And these western so called liberal progressive dupes seem to revel in the promotion of sovereignty in the west as being an inherently racist concept. This is nonsense. Racism is defined as persecution or demeaning of other races based on the idea of racial superiority. The obvious irony is that deliberate unfettered and enforced immigration in to any country in order to colonise, destabilise and destroy it is one of the most extreme racist doctrines that can be carried out and, as mentioned, is recognised as genocide by the UN.

The cruel trick played on the well meaning dupes in the west who support unlimited mass migration and open borders, is that they themselves are the unwitting victims of the worst kind of horrible and vexatious racist doctrine against them.

In a glorious mess of ignorance and zombie like virtue signalling they will even gladly assist and protest on behalf of those elements that want to see them destroyed. That is how effective the cognitive dissonance and propaganda has become and it’s one example of how ultra progressiveness has become ultra regressive.

The immigration debate has been thoroughly polarised by the decaying faux liberal progressiveness. The choice we’re told is to either be on the left and for unbridled open door immigration, or on the right and an ‘anti migrant’, xenophobic, white privileged swivel eyed isolationist supremacist evil patriarchal racist. Or of course anti semitic or, the current faivorate dished out to anyone with a differing view point to the pious Social Justice Warrior; a Nazie. This polarisation circus is no friend of rational debate dealing with facts, logic, reason and truth.

But if the left / right terminology has to be used for the sake of explaining then so be it. To paraphrase a commentator on the Craig Murray blog; whilst economic issues have definitely lurched sharply rightwards in recent years, social issues have moved sharply to the left, by design. This is why there has been such an increase in identity politics – political correctness, third wave feminism, the undermining of the traditional family and the lunacy of the transgender agenda which seeks to deny biological facts and force everyone to agree that 2+2 =5 – all of this to the exclusion of what might be termed ‘old left’ concerns.

And whilst these politically correct issues, also often referred to as cultural Marxism/critical theory, become ever more ubiquitous, issues of rising inequalities, globalisation, transnational corporatism and neo liberal economic thinking as seen in the EU and UN have been largely ignored.

A mass illegal invasion funded and supported by deranged globalists. Photo by SV under CC BY 3.0 licence.

And in this polarised supercharged politically correct climate, when it comes to issues such as mass immigration, there is no room for any middle ground based on rational controlled immigration according to skill, need and capacity – i.e. a normal way for countries to operate. Those expressing these rational views are shouted down by those brainwashed and lost to politically correct and identity politics indoctrination.

Children are also being indoctrinated to become unthinking dutiful global citizens parroting the same well oiled clichés under the globalist deception of sustainable development as seen and heard so commonly.

The indoctrination of political correctness has been so pervasive that it has brainwashed many into dismissing their own countries as parochial annoyances that should be destroyed in favour of a globalist borderless new world order of regions – a horrible hybrid of Orwellianism and a Brave New World.

But how can an indoctrinated global citizen or ‘internationalist’ truly love the world and all its diversity of people if he or she can’t even acknowledge or respect the right of their own country to exist? It tends to be true that it’s people who have love or respect for their own country that are the people who make the best global citizens in its truest sense. Because these individuals can understand and respect true diversity, and know that the differences and idiosyncrasies of the differing nations on earth should be celebrated not treated with scorn and dismissal in favour of enforced globalist uniformity.

As German philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder – an inspiration to the renowned Austrian and honory Welshman writer Leoplold Kohr of ‘small is beautiful’ fame, wrote with some truth:

“The deluged heart of the idle cosmopolite is a hut for no-one.”

It’s also very important to note that the cabal working with and behind the internationalist bankers and financiers who are driving the global mass migration plans have been at it for a very long time indeed. As silly as it sounds to many who haven’t looked objectively and in detail at these things, numerous historians and writers state that this evil conspiracy goes back to the dawn of mankind. In his excellent book ‘Pawns in the Game‘, author William Carr describes how a small group of  ‘false priests and money lenders’ have been at it since before Biblical times trying to create a new world order and to gain full control over its inhabitants. There are many differing opinions on this of course but it seems that, although they may pretend otherwise, they don’t really belong to nor care for any one nation or peoples but it seems they will act as corruptive parasites on any nation, peoples or religion that they deem useful for their goal of full globalist power and control. Carr describes them interchangeably as Illuminati, Pharisees and of the Synagogue of Satan.

Occultism has been there as the instigator of many if not most religions and can be found at the higher levels of most organised religions including Roman Catholicism, Islam, Talmudic Rabbinical Judaism (together with the Zohar/ Kabbalah teachings) , Protestant Christianity, Theosophy, Buddhism, Hinduism, Gaianism and the New Age Movement.  It’s also to be found as a guiding principle in the upper echelons of the unelected United Nations.

What unites all of these is that, at their highest levels, they are following occult and Kabbalistic luciferian doctrine. Or to put it another way, the people behind enforced mass migration around the world, and behind many other things that are disrupting and destroying civilisation as we know it, are working to an agenda most normal people couldn’t even comprehend. They are, at the highest echelons at least, what can only really be described as evil and devoid of morality, and are part of a an affiliated globalist cabal that ultimately seek a one world state and full globalist control, with one government, one currency, one army and one world religion, and with a luciferian god masquerading as the true God. In other words, this is a good old fashioned battle between good and evil. And it is a spiritual battle and spiritual warfare.

What Europe should really look like – a beautiful and diverse kaleidoscope of sovereign nations existing side by side as equals

Which brings us back to why national sovereignty of all nations on earth is so important. Sovereignty, accountability and democracy. Speaking as a Welsh Briton who believes in the fundamental right of countries, including my own country of Wales, to be fully fledged sovereign states in the world, it should be obvious by now that the failed EU and UN projects are about eroding and destroying the sovereignty of nations rather than protecting them. And mass unfettered migration is only one way that they will attempt to do it.

I’m proud of my country of Wales. I’m proud to be from a spirited country that isn’t afraid to fight for its right to exist in a world of diverse, beautifully different nations on earth. And I want it to be free to contribute to civilisation and to humanity in the best way it can.

My patriotism is not based on hate of any other country or people, narrow mindedness or isolationism. It’s based on love of my own country and on the rational concept of the fundamental right of nations to sovereignty on planet earth – a thought crime for the current self appointed liberal elite.

Those that genuinely love and cherish the remarkable cultural richness and diversity of the nations and peoples on earth know that those are the very qualities that the globalist elites want to weaken and eventually destroy if they get their way.

Predictably, our politicians and public figures have failed in their moral duty to expose this horrific conspiracy to destroy all nations. The people of all the nations on earth are realising that they have been cheated by the elites of their countries and have to start holding them to account and shining a light on all their lies.

(This is an adapted version of an article on the Kalergi plan –see here)

 

For more news and opinion visit The Sovereigner

 

 

Advertisements

Geoengineering – time to stop the sniggering

(video of trails over south Wales by Michael Alexis B)

On clear sunny days more and more people are looking up at the sky, unsure of what to make of what they often see.

Many are noticing long lingering trails of aircraft emissions hovering above us, turning our skies in to a grey drab whispy haze (as seen today over the Welsh capital) But why and what are these trails? Aren’t they simply exhaust fumes from planes? And aren’t people who theorise that these could be hazardous to human health and the natural world merely people with overactive imaginations?

It’s an area which causes a dilemma for nervous news publishers across the globe – should they publish a serious story which dares to even question the official line on this matter and risk ‘being called names’ and metaphorically burnt at the stake Galileo style?

It’s not only newspaper editors who are in a pickle. Science, which is supposed to thrive on healthy evidence based questioning and scepticism, has possibly never been such a secretive intolerant club as it is today, gripped by fear and manipulated by governmental grants and corporate financial incentives and control. The end results are inconsistencies and contradictions when it comes to aerial spraying as well as many others subjects.

Trails over Cardiff

At their very basic level, these trails, popularly known as Chemtrails, are believed to be due to a programme of aerial spraying that is being carried out in UK airspace and also over other NATO countries and beyond. The speculation is that aeroplanes are purposefully spraying chemicals and/or tiny particles or fibres into the atmosphere for reasons that are not yet fully understood or officially known. These are said to linger in our skies, often making them hazy, and are also believed to potentially affect the health of humans and the natural world. Some are suggesting that it is to do with weather manipulation and the HAARP technology, the military and defence – others that it is to do with food, crop and general population control. Maybe it’s a case of ‘all of the above.’

atmosphere3

As in a number of other areas such as man-made global warming, there has been  very little room for debate or differing views. This is thankfully gradually changing. The highly contentious IPCC / International Panel on Climate Change and their processes are now being rightly challenged and questioned based on some very worrying allegations. Even so, the so-called liberal mainstream media tries to ensure that those who simply ask questions or express concern or scepticism which doesn’t tie in with the perceived truth, are suitably pilloried with extreme language—‘deniers’, which calls to mind Holocaust deniers (which one, there are so many?) being a particular favorite. Or in the case of chemtrails – tin foil hat wearers, kooks and fruitcakes. Little green men might also be mentioned. The obscene crime of possibly being a Christian or of maybe having an opinion which may not be considered ‘on the left’ may also be targeted when other avenues of derision have been exhausted.

However, there’s a slight problem with such lines of attack. Geoengineering is an officially admitted governmental program of weather modification which ‘proposes’, for example, spraying sulphuric acid into the stratosphere to combat the perceived man-made global warming threat.

The UK Government has acknowledged this ‘proposed’ programme of geoengineering, known as both SRM (Solar Radiation Management) and S.A.I (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection) although there still remains ambiguity between the terminologies of geoengineering, chemtrails, troposphere and stratosphere spraying, leading many to simply call it atmosphere spraying.

chemtrails-5

Another laborious term for this official programme of spraying is Stratospheric Aerosol Geo engineering (S.A.G)  – an officially recognised initiative by the UK Government via the Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative (S.R.M.G.I) which was launched in March 2010 in response to a 2009 Royal Society report called Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty

Trails over Switzerland

Trails over Switzerland

But against all contrary evidence, the releasing of large quantities of aerosols in to the atmosphere by aircraft is still only claimed to be a proposal by authorities rather than an active programme being carried out in the skies above us at a regular rate. A 2009 Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) report titled Geoengineering options for-mitigating climate change proposes the same aerosol spraying ideas but admitted the impacts, costs and risks involved to health and the environment could not be known.

llanelli-UK-July-4th The sky above Llanelli  (Ffoto - Michael Alexis B)

The sky above Llanelli (Ffoto – Michael Alexis B)

The report released in April 2009 outlines ‘possible proposals’ for the release of stratospheric aerosols of sub microscopic particles such as sulphate, metals, dielectrics, resonant scatterers or dust by using aircraft, possibly by addition to aviation fuel, which allegedly reduces the cost of delivery.

The report states that:

“It is clear from the assessment of Geo-engineering options presented here that there are large uncertainties regarding the effectiveness, impacts, technical feasibility, cost and risks of all the schemes considered.”

In other words, nobody can tell what the effects could be. This of course includes risks to human health and the natural environment.

The sky above Oakdale South Wales in 2012

The sky above Oakdale, South Wales in 2012

In their own findings and preliminary notes regarding geoengineering, the SRMGI, which is partnered with The Royal Society, The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), and facilitated by the UK Parliament, seem to indict themselves in regard to the deliberate manipulation of the public, when they stated on the SRMGI‘s own website that the establishment should:

“Involve general public because a) they pay for it, b) they have the power to stop it. Keep them informed on what GE (Geo engineering) is for, but don’t necessarily ask their permission.”

The quote has since been removed but has been archived online.

This all ultimately falls under the UN’s dreaded global Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development doctrine which seeks to control and manipulate a great deal of our lives and environment, often under the false pretext of the ‘Green Mask’ as the American Rosa Koire puts it. Many credible people are going further, with ex Australian politician Ann Bressington  recently announcing that the dangers of geo engineering and Agenda 21 are a threat to health and life as we know it.

This globalist agenda of Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development, as well as seeking to gain control over most aspects of our lives, has been suggested by many to be also working to eradicate national sovereignty, individual rights and all private property, indoctrinating a generation of children to become ‘global citizens’ in a Brave New World global village in the process. Too far-fetched? Or just too much to think about?

It’s claimed that the difference between normal exhaust fumes from an aircraft, known as contrails, and the heavy lingering and hazy chemical trails we’ve seen in recent years, is that contrails are mostly made of crystallised moisture (ice) left by aircraft under very specific conditions; very high altitude and very cold. Contrails dissipate very quickly, even in ideal conditions. However, as many people are observing, chemtrail aerosols linger around for five or more hours and often turn a beautiful blue sky in to a general grey whispy haze.

Flickr-Chemtrail-radiobrain_

Physical evidence has been documented by tens of thousands of citizens throughout Britain and the world for over a decade by now, with millions more observational witnesses. Photographs from skies pre 1990 are believed to demonstrably show that aircraft never used to leave such trails except on very rare occasions. Observers are also claiming that, as more awareness of aerosol spraying is building, the sprayers are subtly adapting their techniques to make themselves more difficult to track and spot.

According to sites such as Chemtrail Project UK , independent labs are detecting toxic levels of aluminum, barium, magnesium and other high levels of conductive and heavy metals elements as well as unknown biological components and nano material in rainwater samples, whilst soil pH levels are reading lower than normal – meaning a potential infertile future soil. The dramatic reduction in bee numbers seen in recent years is also believed to be possibly linked to aerosol spraying.

Going round in circles

Going round in circles

If true, geoengineering/aerosol spraying programmes are being implemented outside of any legal framework, national or international, without the knowledge or informed consent of the populations, and in violation of the most elementary scientific and health precautionary principles.

The sky over Wales on 9th April 2012

The sky over Wales on 9th April 2012

And if any aerosols are being released in to the atmosphere above Wales for whatever reason or initiative, there is obviously a clear duty on the Welsh Government to fully investigate this under their devolved responsibilities for environment/pollution, food, health, and the public welfare and human rights of all Welsh citizens. As of yet no one in the Welsh Government has broached the subject.

A Sovereign Wales petition for an independent investigation was turned down by the Welsh Government on the basis that anything to do with aircraft has nothing to do with Wales – an almost literal head in the sand reasoning. See inadmissible petitions here (page 43).

It’s interesting to note that the Welsh Government did not seek to deny the claim of aerosol spraying, merely to deny all responsibility and accountability – something which could not be allowed to happen in a truly sovereign state and should not be morally allowed under any situation.

The Skyguard initiative held a conference at the European Parliament in Brussels in 2013 to address this issue, supported by MEP Mrs Tatjana Zdanoka and with speakers from numerous European countries as well as the USA as can be seen in the following video:

The subject has also been discussed at UN level as can be seen here:

This south Wales You Tube channel offers some real observable evidence of lingering aerosol trails:

So far, people merely asking rational questions about the possible health implications of any aerosol release programmes are met with derision and even anger. Wikipedia, as with a number of other sensitive issues, does not seem to be able to provide a balanced source of information in this area but there are plenty of good sites that provide some solid information and help – Look up! being one of the better ones in Britain as well as the previously mentioned Chemtrail Project UK

Questions regarding who exactly is spraying and why exactly they are doing it are still unresolved but it’s no longer good enough to simply dismiss the valid questions being raised as wild conspiracy theories, fantasy and tin foil hat territory. The lazy name calling and sniggering needs to make way for rational investigation to take place by qualified independent as well as governmental sources. All the available evidence needs to be considered and the findings published and peer-reviewed for all of us to see. But don’t leave it to the experts – do your own research, look up, think, speak, consider.

%d bloggers like this: